JustMarried.Us


  1. image: download

    There’s a rainbow over Vermont today, where gay and lesbian couples began legally saying “I do.” To celebrate, the state’s iconic ice cream brand, Ben & Jerry’s, shed a few pounds and gained a svelte gay hubby: “Hubby Hubby” will replace ”Chubby Hubby” as September’s flavor of choice. In partnership with Freedom to Marry, the month-long campaign is designed to raise awareness for the importance of marriage equality. Swing by any Vermont Ben & Jerry’s shop this month and commit to a Hubby Hubby sundae. With peanut butter, pretzels, vanilla and fudge, equality never tasted so sweet.

    There’s a rainbow over Vermont today, where gay and lesbian couples began legally saying “I do.” To celebrate, the state’s iconic ice cream brand, Ben & Jerry’s, shed a few pounds and gained a svelte gay hubby: “Hubby Hubby” will replace ”Chubby Hubby” as September’s flavor of choice. In partnership with Freedom to Marry, the month-long campaign is designed to raise awareness for the importance of marriage equality. Swing by any Vermont Ben & Jerry’s shop this month and commit to a Hubby Hubby sundae. With peanut butter, pretzels, vanilla and fudge, equality never tasted so sweet.

     
    Comments (View)

    Share/Save/Bookmark
  2. Deny for Deny: Should Gays Boycott Straight Weddings?

    This week on Top Chef: Season 6, lesbian contestant Ashley Merriman got fired up about a wedding-related challenge because she and the show’s other LGBT contestants “are not allowed in that institution.” Her sense of conflict sparked discussion with fellow lesbian chef Preeti Mistry, who validated Merriman’s anger—saying that she herself has a partner of 13 years—but also pragmatically noted, “This is the world we live in today.”

    In the gray area between these two women’s perspectives lies an important question in the way we approach the topic of marriage equality with our straight friends and potential allies. It is a question I first considered earlier this week when I came across the National Marriage Boycott, a student-led LGBT rights group that is calling on heterosexuals to boycott marriage until we can all say “I do.” The question is: Can we really seek to deny matrimonial bliss to straight couples just because we can’t share the cake? Or as Merriman may have wished, should we opt out of participating in opposite-sex weddings—even when it is our job or our familial duty to be there—because of our own personal discomfort? Isn’t that sort of the pot calling the kettle black?

    The Top Chef wedding brouhaha compelled top judge Tom Colicchio to confront the issue in his blog, “On Rites, Rights, and Cooking Right.” True to character, Colicchio issued a tough but fair assessment: After a hefty helping of support for marriage equality (“The institution of marriage should be available to all,” he wrote), Colicchio defended the show’s wedding-themed challenge and recalled three similar previous episodes (including a gay wedding in San Francisco back in Season 1). But then he said this:

    “I understand how Ashley felt, but by logical extension, does this mean that she would never attend a friend’s wedding or prepare something for that wedding ceremony as a gift? If a couple came to her restaurant wanting to host their reception there, would she turn them away?

    That’s the money question, isn’t it? Would Merriman—or any of us who have ever felt pangs of regret and jealously in the face of two lovebirds about to be married—really deny her blessing to, say, her best friend’s nuptials? Would she refuse the patronage of a wedding party at her Seattle restaurant? Perhaps—and it would be a bold and understandable, even honorable, statement. But is this act of protest good for her friendship or for her business? Probably not so much. So is it good for the business of obtaining marriage equality?

    Don’t get me wrong: I sympathize with Chef Merriman’s very justified reaction to the wedding challenge. Similarly, I appreciate the efforts (and tweeted my support) of the National Marriage Boycott to gain visibility for the marriage equality movement. And I am hugely flattered by any straight couple who would waive their right to marriage in solidarity to our cause. But if we believe that marriage equality will strengthen the institution of marriage—which we do!—should we not bolster that institution even as we storm its gates?

    Boycotting marriage may provide us with some temporary relief from the frustration of inequality, but it also disposes of a great opportunity: The opportunity to show not just our huge esteem for the institution of marriage but to show ourselves in the context of marriage. By taking a seat at our straight friends’ weddings, or by preparing the food for their nuptials, we are in a subtle yet very potent way asking them to exercise good manners and pass the frickin cake. -chf

    *Recommended reading: “Changing Hearts and Minds One Wedding at a Time,” by Waymon Hudson for the Bilerico Project.


     
    Comments (View)

    Share/Save/Bookmark
  3. Worse than losing the love of your life is not being allowed to say goodbye: The importance of hospital visitation.

    Last week, we wrote here about the need for lgbt couples to secure marriage-like legal documentation—advanced healthcare directives, living wills and power of attorney—to protect them in cases of illness and emergency. Today, Washington Blade contributor Rebecca Armendariz penned, “Losing the Love of My Life: There is nothing more painful than the death of a partner—except being denied hospital visitation.”

    Rebecca is a straight ally who recently lost her partner, Clark, to melanoma. For the 16 months that Clark was sick, Rebecca was constantly by his side. And in those 16 months, not one doctor or nurse or hospital orderly denied Rebecca access to her dying partner, despite their status as an unmarried couple. Rebecca and Clark notably did not possess healthcare directives or power of attorney.

    For those of us who have never experienced such a tragedy, it is impossible to know the pain and heartbreak of losing the one you love the most. But, Rebecca says, it “would have been exponentially more difficult if we were a same-sex couple.”

    Case in point: When Lisa Pond collapsed from an aneurysm, the Florida hospital where she was admitted allowed Pond’s three children and her partner of 18 years, Janice Langbehn, five minutes to visit just before she died. Five minutes. After 18 years together, the couple had just five minutes to say goodbye.

    Lambda Legal has since taken the Langbehn case, which seeks to establish much-needed precedent for hospital visitation issues among unmarried couples—couples like Lisa and Janice and like Rebecca and Clark.

    Stories like these make it clear that the Marriage Equality Movement is not just about marriage. No doubt Lisa and Janice felt themselves married—we do not need the government to sanction our relationships. But the need for marriage equality is so much more dire than the right to shout our love from the rooftops or even to save some money on our taxes. Marriage is a human right, one that guarantees that every person is allowed to care, and be cared for by, another. Nobody wants to die alone. And nobody should have to.

     
    Comments (View)

    Share/Save/Bookmark
  4. “Forty Year Later, Still Second-Class Citizens”

    In yesterday’s New York Times, columnist Frank Rich penned one of the smartest, most poignant pieces on gay rights—from Stonewall to now—that we’ve read in a while. We especially love this quote (we’ve been thinking the exact same thing):

    If the country needs any Defense of Marriage Act at this point, it would be to defend heterosexual marriage from the right-wing “family values” trinity of Sanford, Ensign and Vitter.

    -Frank Rich, “Forty Years Later, Still Second-Class Americans,” The New York Times, June 28, 2009.

    Our community’s got a great friend in Frank Rich.

     
    Comments (View)

    Share/Save/Bookmark
  5. “Just Married” Live on CNN

    On May 27, 2009, just 24 hours after the California Supreme Court’s announcement to uphold Prop 8, we were invited to share our reaction to the court’s decision. They found us on Twitter! (@JustMarriedUs)

     
    Comments (View)

    Share/Save/Bookmark